Egy zuhanás anatómiája

  • Franciaország Anatomie d'une chute (több)
Előzetes 1


A világ legrangosabb filmfesztiváljának fődíját, a Cannes-i Arany Pálmát elnyerő lélektani krimiben Sandra (Sandra Hüller) idillinek látszó élete kártyavárként omlik össze. A sikeres német írónő francia férjével és látássérült gyerekükkel élnek a francia Alpok egyik kis falujában. A férfi váratlan halála után nem egyértelmű, hogy baleset, öngyilkosság vagy gyilkosság történt. Sandra ezért a rendkívül megterhelő nyomozás és tárgyalás középpontjába kerül. A már-már hitchcocki hagyományokat követő filmben az eseményeket végig a feleség szemszögéből követjük, miközben a néző számára is kérdéses az ártatlansága. Az Egy zuhanás anatómiája azonban sokkal több bűnügyi történetnél: Justine Triet rendezőt elsősorban a házasság, és alapvetően az emberi kapcsolatok legmélyebb rétegei érdeklik. (Mozinet)


Videók (3)

Előzetes 1

Recenziók (5)


az összes felhasználói recenzió

magyar Sandra Hüller újabb kiváló színészi alakítása, akinek két filmje is találkozott idén a Cannes filmfesztivál versenyszekciójában (a másik a The Zone of Interest). Bár ő a főszereplő, végig nem tudjuk, hogy bűnös-e vagy sem. Arckifejezése és előadásmódja többnyire hűvös, érezzük benne a gyilkost, de teljesen természetesen játssza az ártatlant. Már a szereposztása is tökéletes húzás volt. Egyébként egy dialógusokkal teli, hosszabb játékidővel rendelkező film, melynek része egy tárgyalás is, a tragikus esemény érdekes, eljárás szerinti nyomozással. A nehéz igazságkeresés kétértelműségét tekintve kiváló minőségű rendezés ()


az összes felhasználói recenzió

angol Flawless, pure dramatic form with the magnetic Sandra Hüller and a fantastic child actor. The film’s strength flows from the way it takes the central detective mystery from the field of a procedural crime movies to that of a character study with the child protagonist at the center. The post-Cannes hype was enormous, though I had mild reservations about Anatomy of a Fall due to the fact that it is in some respects too cold and professorial. ()



az összes felhasználói recenzió

angol God, I am so pissed!! The worst cinema experience of this year. I accidentally stepped in shit when I preferred this to DiCaprio, as I love courtroom movies (what could possibly go wrong?), but to get my Anatomy and Dissection without anesthetics! I really didn't expect it. Anatomy of a Fall is one of those movies that when it ends, half the theater screams with joy FINALLY!!! and goes to buy champagne and get really drunk that this shit is finally over, because I couldn’t believe it anymore! (I thought it was funny to look around the hall half way through the film and realise that half the people were actually asleep). It terms of craftsmanship, it's a cheap film that looks like it was made by a law student (terrible cinematography, ugly visuals, no film look), it has a crazy 150 miinute running time with a painfully slow pace (I've really never seen a worse courtroom film in my life). Moreover, the whole film evoked for me the Michael Peterson case (The Staircase), but that was a level above in every way. The execution for me is almost repulsive and the trial is absolutely bland (the best performance here is by a dog!), and the biggest kick in the balls comes at the very end where you get no explanation. A murder mystery without revelation, that's what I call a bold move, which makes me wonder for what purpose such a film was made in the first place? I want to turn back time, I want to turn back money, I want to turn back the mood. I'm going to go and watch the French film Guilty immediately to fix my mood (which coincidentally has an identical 85%, but the qualities are completely different). This really sounds like a bad April Fool's joke. I was going crazy with boredom in the cinema like I haven't in a long time. For my part, this is the prototypical boring arthouse drama that I heartily hate. Had I played the movie at home, I would have thrown the TV out the window in a huff! Terrible. 2/10. ()


az összes felhasználói recenzió

angol I'm incredibly happy that my internal assessment agreed with the main jury of this year's Cannes Film Festival, headed by Ruben Östlund (Triangle of Sadness, The Square), and that Anatomy of a Fall won the main prize, the Palme d'Or. I was incredibly surprised by Justine Triet because I found Sibyl, the last film she presented at Cannes, rather mediocre. On the other hand, it was the first time I saw Sandra Hüller and I was immediately attracted to her, her scenes are the best of the film. Anatomy of a Fall jumps to the top of my rating system and I consider it a masterpiece that I will definitely want to see again. Sandra, Samuel and their son Daniel live in the mountains, not far from Grenoble. The opening scene already suggests that Sandra and Samuel's relationship is likely to be strained, and a few minutes later, Samuel is found dead. The investigation into this mysterious death, which basically admits only two theories, and the subsequent trial, leads to a deep analysis of the couple's relationship. Daniel, who, despite his visual impairment, is a key witness, also has to take part in all this. So far, it doesn’t look like an original and innovative story, right? But Justine Triet manages to present this theme seen a thousand times before in a fresh and unusual way. I can say for myself that I loved every minute of the long running time, I wasn't bored for a second and I can't find a single dead spot. A lot of credit goes to all the actors, whose performances are breathtaking. Sandra Hüller is undoubtedly the queen, but Milo Machado Graner is equally fabulous, and I have to give credit to Antoine Reinartz as the prosecutor. The screenplay and the dialogues also deserve credit. The gradual unraveling of the relationship dynamics between Sandra and Samuel, the revelation of their pasts, problems and disputes to help reveal the truth, as well as Daniel's contradiction between his own memories and what he hears in court, which leads to his utter confusion, are absolutely brilliant. The figure of Daniel, tormented by uncertainty and doubt, is of crucial importance for the denouement, and at the same time it is a mirror of the viewers themselves, who also cannot say for sure how it all happened. A very important moment is the dialogue between Daniel and the social worker: When we are in doubt and unsure, we have no choice but to make a decision... and so, in the end, must we. [Festival de Cannes 2023] ()


az összes felhasználói recenzió

angol Justine Triet delivers a superbly written and filmed study of family ties at a moment of the greatest test of trust, but to be honest, it passed me by in a big way. This long, largely procedural drama is unfortunately as cold as the snout of the dog starring in it, and consequently as cold as the mountain setting in which it takes place. It was a creative choice, of course, but all those pivotal dramatic moments that I had to wait a long time for didn't work and didn't interest me at all. Though I somewhat enjoyed the ambiguity of some of the messages, I am still far from enthusiastic as a viewer. [KVIFF 2023] ()

Galéria (15)

Kapcsolódó hírek

36. Európai Filmdíj - jelölések

36. Európai Filmdíj - jelölések


November 7-én, kedden bejelentették a 36. Európai Filmdíj jelöléseit, amelyek a 2023-as év legjelentősebb európai filmalkotásokra hívják fel a figyelmet. A legjobb európai film kategóriában versenyez… (több)