Gyilkos Joe

Friedkin ásza nem annyira a cselekmény, mint inkább a figurák különlegessége és minden, ami kisüthet belőlük. Vagyis, hogy mire képesek, és ha valami rosszul sül el, hogyan oldják meg azt a parasztos rövidlátásukkal. Famózus csirkés blow-job jelenet. Nem reméltem hasonló alakításokat McConaughey-től Ha ölni kell és Amistad idején. Ez a színész elindult a csillagokhoz! És általánosan is itt minden résztvevő kiválóan teljesít. Egy éles tökös film,nem teljesen ép elmével. (2012.11.24)

William Friedkin is again at the top of his game. Killer Joe is a thriller with a not very original plot, but it compensates that with several pleasantly unexpected twists, an uncompromisingly dirty atmosphere and fantastic performances by most of the people involved. Most of the attention is drawn by the wonderfully sleazy Matthew McConaughey, his Joe will no doubt be one of the best film villains of the year. The other actors are also very good, only Emile Hirsch was a little unconvincing. One of the most pleasant surprises in recent years, thumbs up. Very intense climax. 9/10 (2012.10.19)

So one day, you’re going through Matthew McConaughey’s movies and watch all of these American hillbillies hanging out with him. His role in this movie – killer Joe – is basically the only normally thinking person in this entire movie. Even though he also has his “moments”. For example, the ending is a downright delicacy for movie connoisseurs. But the people he surrounds himself with are the sorts of characters who look like they’ve had five pints of beer and escaped from a loony bin. Their behavior, actions, reactions to certain situations… nothing here makes any sense. To be honest, I didn’t get it. And I was fascinated by Juno Temple who is apparently twelve in this movie. What?! Well, in any case, I have to say that the movie had balls and that’s why I’m rating it three stars. (2014.04.13)

Granted, Letts's source material comes across as nothing more than an unsophisticated theatrical Southern variation on McDonagh's productions, but with all the unadulterated fun, who cares, right? (2013.05.12)

A rough Texas ride where no one has anything to lose. Once Matthew McConaughey starts delivering his lines in full force, this strange family drama kicks into high gear, and it's a shame that the blood, dirt, and slightly bizarre atmosphere become too much towards the very end. With clearer direction, Killer Joe, thanks to its perfect cast, could have aimed for a higher level. (2013.04.03)

Killer Joe is known to me from the theater stage. My wife was somewhat disgusted by the performance, which obviously tried to appeal to a younger audience and was far from the classic form of bourgeois theater. Partying, intercourse, violence... basically not something for delicate souls. However, I appreciated the black sarcastic humor and I would rate the theatrical play highly. Tracy Letts delved into the life of American white poverty, which we know best in the stylized performance of the sitcom My Name is Earl. But here, it is significantly more raw and devoid of softening humor. No textbook characters, not much intelligence, and considerably down-to-earth motivations. On the stage, the play functioned as a completely cynical comedy, whereas William Friedkin shifted it more toward the position of a classic crime thriller, and I slightly dislike this shift. Matthew McConaughey functions more as a violent maniac and sexual deviant rather than a pragmatic provider of special services who increasingly demands payment for the work done. As for the casting and acting, I have no objections, but I would appreciate it much more if the film stuck to my original vision of Killer Joe as a dark comedy about very flawed people. Overall impression: 65%. (2015.11.08)

Rednecks... Killer Joe has a very usual plot, but everything else about it is very unusual. McConaughey revels in his slimy villainy and he does great. The heated finale ranks among the best and also the most freaky that I’ve seen during past years. The cast is excellent and mainly William Friedkin shows the best in him. (2012.10.19)

Amazing acting, dialogue scenes like in a Tarantino film, and an incredibly precise redneck touch. Essentially, very good filmmaking, I just didn't quite understand why it all came about in the first place. In most films of a similar nature, there is more or less a hidden message that you have to read between the lines. I couldn't find it here. Very gratuitous, as if Friedkin was trying to prove that he still has the chops. (2014.10.27)

If Quentin Tarantino didn’t exist, Killer Joe would certainly be a concept. But this way, especially in comparison with his similarly tuned conversational films, its underdevelopment and superficiality become clear. Friedkin builds primarily on unreadable characters and their conflicts with each other, but the story has too few unexpected twists and only one memorable scene with cult potential. The biggest positives for me remain Matthew McConaughey, who is charismatic as shit, and I'd quickly turn away with my tail between my legs if I met him on the street, and the overall stylistic execution of form and content, which at times is quite close to Quentin's. (2016.07.25)

Insanity, and total insanity at that. I absolutely wouldn't dare predict how the whole thing might turn out. It's not a consequence of the "subtlety" and "thoughtfulness" of the story, it's more a consequence of the fact that the behavior of the characters in this film is completely unpredictable, and what may appear to be an overly bizarre solution to the "problem" here (either in physical terms or some kind of reasoning) may be considered one of the alternatives – and even the most "acceptable" alternative. Friedkin bets on the bizarreness of the story right from the beginning – the opening dialogue in the rain lures you in such a way that afterwards you simply devour the whole film like a cherry (though it’s not impossible to vomit some of it up). The ensemble of actors is really great, but Matthew McConaughey towers slightly above the rest. (2013.01.01)