A lehetetlen

Hosszabb bevezető (Titanic) vagy folytonos visszatekintések (127 óra) nélkül, amelyek többet mondanának a szereplőkről és közelebb hoznának hozzájuk, nem tudtam érzelmileg belekapcsolódni a filmbe. A szeretteink nevének kiabálása és egy hosszú, drámaian szerkesztett futás a karjaikba ezt nem pótolhatja. Jól leforgatva és rendesen eljátszva, de csak az első jelre támadva, sűrűbb gondolat vagy a karakterek pszichológiai alapja nélkül. És egy igazán *szép* zenei téma, de nem kellett volna tízpercenként lejátszani. (2013.02.07)

I'm amazed by the design of the disaster - it's a demonstration of what a good filmmaker can do without an army of computers, only by working with perspective and shooting methods. For me, a completely equal affair with the sinking of the ship in Pi and his life smeared with mud and blood. Otherwise - I'm always wondering if the "real story" is just an alibi to excuse the usual schemes and clichés, or if the filmmaker can draw more than a few notorious lessons from the disaster about the fragility of man and the power of humanity (the last one who really captivated me was Danny Boyle and his rock climbing amputation). For me, in key moments The Impossible slips into uncovered exploitation, from which I soon lost all pleasure (sometimes I hesitated whether the tension was still meant seriously - vomiting of eyelashes and blood, which inadvertently looks like a B-movie horror scene). I want to see something more than just what I know from documentaries and the news, even if it's dressed in a masterful form. But the talk about the stars and the melodramatic passing are as if from a different sea than the realistic wave of dirt that so brutally tore me down against my will at the beginning. For Bayon, I actually have words of respect, but he really should be careful about the innocent submission to the expectations of the "genre". And he should try digging deeper, because this film is actually just "disaster tourism", where everything is solved by harmonious love... and good insurance. (2013.01.30)

Finally, in this flood of dry and by-the-numbers award catchers, there is a film with heart that you can enjoy without a theoretical analysis. Impressive, intense, brilliantly made (the tsunami scene!) and touching like nothing in many years. Of course, sometimes the story is very clearly modified for the needs of the script (the casual mass reunion reminded me a little to the similarly made-up phone call in Argo). But when it works so well, who cares. (2013.01.06)

Bayona puts his previous experience with the horror genre to good use right from the beginning. The disconcerting musical motif and the method of filming (looking up from the depths) transform  the tranquil ocean surface into a sinister monster that may come to life in an unguarded moment. The fast-moving, screen-filling wave turns the master of creation into a defenceless being. The characters have nowhere to run, and we don’t either. Thanks to the rumbling sound effects, this is one of the most impressive images of destruction that I have “endured” at the cinema in recent years with respect to the visceral experience that it provides. The 3D glasses were paradoxically unnecessary. ___ After we and the characters are pummelled by the uncontrollable force of nature,   the film smoothly transitions into a family melodrama. The demonstration of brilliant special effects alternates with acting that is tenacious in both body and soul. Naomi Watts excels and she suffers the most of all the characters (perhaps because that’s how it happened in reality, or perhaps because she is a woman and this is a melodrama). She is supported superbly and without superfluous words by Tom Holland, who fits his role even better than Ewan McGregor, whose tense emotional state is obviously only a matter of acting. ___ The change in the eldest son’s behaviour shows how drastically such an extreme experience can alter one’s personal hierarchy of values. Material conveniences are suddenly needless, a cola can becomes a valuable treasure and children can no longer rely on the fact that adults will take care of everything necessary. The previous relationship hierarchy has become broken, roles have been reversed. ___ The simple idea of the importance of family cohesion and helping each other is consistently, though with (understandable) tendencies toward melodramatic excess, woven into the narrative, which brings a sense of urgency to the retelling of an eight-year-old story. We have to face the fact that our loved ones will be the only people to help us in the event of an economic (or other) collapse predicted by the sceptics. ___ The greatest tension in the film is created by delaying the moment of the scattered family members’ reunion. We anticipate the re-establishment of the initial harmony due to the logic of the melodrama genre, which Bayona was clearly well aware of and he does everything he can to make us unsure of whether the restoration of the status quo will happen too late. It’s thus not surprising that the emotional highlight of the film is in the form of a masterfully arranged scene of multiple characters passing each other in space. ___ I would venture to say that such an emotionally concise, superbly directed melodrama that makes full use of the privileges of the big screen has not appeared in cinemas at least since Titanic. 80% (2013.01.30)

The director is insanely talented and the story is one of the saddest events of the current era. I knew that this was about to be an emotional ride. It’d be weird if it wasn’t. The story that is based on real-life events might be focusing on only one of many families, but at the same time, it reflects the stories of all the families that stayed there and were affected by the tsunami. The filmmaking is so good that I couldn’t even believe how well the director connected CGI with reality. I must admit that at times, I was just gaping at the screen. Well, not at times, more like for two whole hours. The environment was so real that I felt as if the Spanish author truly had some small village flooded so he could shoot this movie to show each and every one of us just how terrible it all looked when the tsunami came. The cherry on top and the reason I decided to give this movie five stars was the moment when I read that the survivors were watching the movie and they said that the atmosphere couldn’t have been any more accurate. Hats off! (2013.06.18)