Géppisztolyos prédikátor

A mesteri Szörnyek keringője alkotója Istenbe vetette a hitét, és elvesztette az eszét. De a szíve megmaradt - a filmje a Stone World Trade Center filmjére emlékeztetett - egyszerűen, patetikusan előadott anyag az ártatlanok szenvedéséről és arról, hogy segíteni kell egymáson. Egy naiv öncélú film az átlagos amerikaiak számára, akik a Bibliában találnak menedéket. Az Istenről szóló prédikációs jeleneteket, amelyekből itt több van, mint a pápáról szóló dokumentumfilmben, az ateista néző nem fogja megemészteni, és ez rontja a film általi élményét. Amikor Butler hitszónok ezután felveszi a puskát, ez ugyan feldobja a film szórakoztató értékét, de a kivitelezés már nem tűnik meggyőzőnek. A harmadik csillagot a színes és egzotikus filmzenéért adom, amelyet már előre ismertem, így még élvezetesebbé tette a nézést; és az afrikai gyerekek iránti "nagy szívért". Ha nagyobb cinikus lennék, nem is gondolnék rá. (2012.01.04)

I have one big problem with Machine Gun Preacher, or maybe two. The first is that Childer’s transformations are terribly sudden and the movie concentrates much more on the less interesting parts, like when the asshole becomes a nice guy, while it concentrates only very briefly on the part when the nice guy becomes a murderous maniac, which is much better and more interesting. And Butler’s acting is excellent and it would have been far more bombastic if they had concentrated on a shorter section of time in more detail, rather than trying to map his entire “working" life. The second problem is that I don’t much like what happens in this picture. Building an orphanage in the middle of a war zone is a very bad idea. Did Sam ever think about what those people were going to do when they grow up? (2012.05.19)

I did not believe it. The problem to me is the main actor, or rather the character he plays. It's not that Gerard Butler’s performance is poor, not at all, quite the opposite, but apparently the script does not allow the viewer to feel his transformation impulsively and realistically enough. So I was not convinced by bad Butler becoming good Butler. And since that is supposed to be a key element of the film, it completely failed. At least they maintained a consistent pattern (rough bad Butler, rough good Butler), and fortunately, they didn't turn him into a monk. However, it is still a very inconsistent thing, the same goes for the technical aspect. At times it looks like we won't even see any blood, you get the impression that it is aiming for PG-13 and then some unprecedented brutality follows. I expected the director of Quantum of Solace to have a much stronger action directorial style. I really don't know what to think about all of this. In any case, I believe that this film did not impress any of the many ethnic groups or film fans, despite (or precisely because) everyone could take something of their own from it. (2012.03.25)

I didn't even believe Gerard Butler that he was shooting this time, let alone being somehow mesmerized by his "transformation" from a dope-smoking biker released from prison into a man who found God, and then into a Rambo-esque fighter who doesn't hesitate to fill the kidnappers of African children with lead. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against movies showing any religion from a more appealing side. But what was this supposed to be? An unintentionally ridiculous spectacle, which I didn't believe all the more because it was based on reality. (2013.11.04)

Excellent Czech title, but let it be. "The Preacher Kalashnikov" is exactly the kind of film that will make you think about whether you should consider adopting a little black boy from Africa from a distance. But then you will say to yourself whether it is actually worth it when there is a fairly high probability that he will be shot as a child. The strength of the film lies in its foundation, which is the real life of one person and his convictions. Gerard Butler - the main reason why I sought out the film - proves that he can act. You believe his tough pose, love for neighbor, and the anger he carries within himself. As a macho killer, he is probably the least believable, but it comes with the territory. The film is not as powerful as, for example, some documentary from Africa, but it definitely has nothing to be ashamed of. It will attack your emotions, it will shock you. It happens in Africa and we do nothing about it. When attention is drawn to it, maybe at least one person will rise up and want to help. That is enough. The film does not unnecessarily exploit, it makes sense. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/diar-milovnika-filmu-c-0004-hugo-buh.html (2013.02.15)