The Legend of Tarzan
The Legend of Tarzan
Rendező:
David YatesOperatőr:
Henry BrahamZeneszerző:
Rupert Gregson-WilliamsSzereplők:
Alexander Skarsgård, Margot Robbie, Ella Purnell, Samuel L. Jackson, Christoph Waltz, Djimon Hounsou, Jim Broadbent, Casper Crump, Simon Russell Beale (több)Streaming (3)
Tartalmak(1)
John Clayton (Alexander Skarsgård) jól öltözött és jól nevelt úriember, a viktoriánus Anglia átlagos polgára. De csak egy évtizede. Éppen amikor már minden jó akarója azt hinné, hogy a benne lapuló vadember végleg eltűnt, hírét veszi, hogy egykori otthonában, Kongóban gonosz dolgok zajlanak. Egy bánya új területeket foglal, nem ismer kíméletet, és már az ő régi barátait is veszélyezteti. A férfi odautazik, és kénytelen harcba szállni a civilizációpusztító erejével. És miközben minden eszközt bevet, hogy megállítsa a fehér ember terjeszkedését, saját maga is visszaváltozik azzá, akinek született, és aki titokban mindig is volt. Ahogy a ruha lefoszlik róla, ismét ő lesz a dzsungel ura, a vadon szövetségese, a legyőzhetetlen Tarzan. (InterCom)
(több)Videók (12)
Recenziók (11)
Van, aki talán élvezi is ezt a ponyvát, de én percről percre idegesítőbbnek találtam. Pedig olyan ígéretesen indult. Favreau A dzsungel könyve című filmjével egyértelműen győzött.
()
At first I was surprised with the story itself. The thing is that the film does not offer the classical view of Tarzan’s life in the jungle, but it starts at a moment when Tarzan is already a cultivated and respectable English subject with an aristocratic past and the manners or a true elderly gentleman. The beginning seems really good and it is really entertaining. But after about half an hour, Tarzan sets off on a journey to his original homeland. There is a plot twist and the story goes back to its beginning. So once again Tarzan is flying around on endless lianas – a liana in one hand, the beautiful Jane in the other – and he’s fighting against British colonists. At that point, the excitement starts to wane and unfortunately it doesn’t get better again. It’s fine, but this movie doesn’t deserve more than three stars to be swung towards it on a liana.
()
I would easily call the very beginning of the film brilliant. You tell yourself that this wouldn't be just any movie. But then the genius just disappears. And then it reappears in maybe two or three scenes. So there are as many scenes that are very good as there are scenes where you want to burst out laughing at the ineptitude. Aside from the sometimes rather trite script, the biggest weakness is Tarzan himself. I don't know if it was a poor choice of actor or if he was just written that oddly, but I wasn't impressed at all. I get it, he was raised by animals and had to behave differently, but this just wasn't it. So muscles... fine, he had them. But charisma? None. Too bad. On the other hand, the best thing about the whole movie, from my point of view, was the charming Margot. She had an interestingly written character and she could sell it. Otherwise, I'd recommend The Jungle Book, which came out at almost the same time. That one is much more sophisticated and catchy. 3 stars.
()
The beating heart, wide open eyes, and dancing soul of a former ten-year-old geek who has read everything that could be found about the ubiquitous man from the apes family. You don't forget your childhood loves even two decades later, and David Yates knows how to tell stories about heroes, villains, love, and friendship in such a fresh yet old-fashioned way that I have no defense. Alexander Skarsgård was born for the role of John Clayton, and when Margot Robbie for the first time in her career isn't annoying me, I am most excited after some slight hesitation. The power of the story and its message outweigh any quiet objections about minor physical flaws. I would take a sequel immediately, and even though the creators surprisingly quickly exhausted one storyline (Opar), I have dozens of directions in my head to explore.
()
Animals versus colonialism or the Swedish model makes Africa great again. When the creators are already pushing so hard on the racial and colonial aspect, the character of the scattered and theatrically very faint Aryan is very interesting, by which I do not want to suggest that anything from The Legend of Tarzan deserves to be taken seriously. Attempts at moralizing are as rigid as trying to tell two stories at once (both the "origin" and the new storyline drag on). Christopher Waltz could send his less talented double to the set to play the villainous roles, and David Yates confirms that he is a boring director, especially when the screenwriters don't give him brisk dialogues. Plus, it sometimes looks like some of the shots disappeared, so Samuel L. Jackson fires like a rich Texan. I can also forget that the film opens a meaningless amount of storylines and tells them very roughly, and sometimes not at all. Favreau didn't try a tenth of the "serious overlaps" in The Jungle Book, yet his film looks ten times more mature than this CGI nonsense. One then notices with fascination all the bullshit, such as the fact that a man living his whole life among gorillas is shaved like a real Dandy. Well, the nobleman's son won’t be denied.
()
Galéria (64)
Photo © Warner Bros.
Hirdetés