A kör 2

Felkészültem a csalódásra, de arra nem számítottam, hogy egyáltalán nem lesz kedvem véleményt írni róla. Eleinte van némi lehetőség ígéretes történetfejlődésre, de a klisés és a sztori szempontjából értelmetlen jelenetek későbbi tálalásával a néző bizalma elszáll, és finálé alatt már minden mindegy neki. Teljesen ellentétes görbe, mint az első film. A forgatókönyv csak jobban ízesített turmix, mindenáron próbál VALAMIT találni az előző témában, amibe belekapaszkodhat. Samara karakterének már nincs súlya, a félelem kb. 30%-ban működik (ha 90%-ban működött az első filmben) és gyakran megbukik azon, hogy a rendező a digitális effektusok működőképességére hagyatkozik, amit addig nem engedhetett meg magának, és ami sajnos teljesen öncélú. Az egyetlen pozitívum: a kezdeti "supernatural feeling", ami nagyszerű szarvasjelenetben csúcsosodik ki, decens kamera, kiváló Hans Zimmer központi motívuma és még mindig csinos Naomi Watts. (2005.04.12)

Same cassette, same Rachel and Aidan, same gloomy "neither night nor day" atmosphere, same musical background. And Nakata didn't manage it the same way. The plot itself is already absurd, and from the trailer, it is more or less clear that the film has to fall apart at some point, which eventually happens with the unnecessary detour to Samara's mother. However, it is precisely the connection to the visual style of the first film that gives a sense of a cohesive story. Moreover, when I remember the deer or the fateful well, it immediately gives me goosebumps and convinces me that the second Ring is definitely not the disaster it promised to be. However, I wouldn't venture into further experiments because the aura of the first film could develop a dangerous crack. (2006.07.08)

Solidly shot wholes/half-parts clash with utterly incompetently shot details in this aesthetically very uneven work. But the camera impotence and the inability to captivate are nothing compared to the stupidity of the script, which has more logical errors than holes in Swiss cheese. And even the idea itself – if it can be called that at all – is rather laughable. (2005.12.09)

A typical sequel. The screenwriters apparently decided to give the first part a good beating, they wanted everything to be even more gripping, shocking and scary, but somehow it didn’t go beyond the effort. The Ring 2 doesn't have nearly the atmosphere of fear that Verbinski's film could boast, all the scares are forced and unsuccessful, the director serves one cliché after another, ultimately drowning the great performances and plot potential. The story digs its own grave from the beginning, sinking deeper and deeper into it, despite the great effort to scare the viewer and keep a true horror face. A big pompous sequel trying to capitalize on the success of the excellent first one, which, while watchable, is still best avoided. (2012.03.11)

Technically brilliantly filmed, unatmospheric boredom. The main problem is that it completely lacks the atmosphere of part one. This is mainly due to the incredibly dumb screenplay that is all sixes and sevens, absolutely ignoring the rules laid down last time round. Here “fear" is invoked by randomly located, cheap, non-functional frights. The actors have nothing at all to act, so they are stylized into one common expression, and that unfortunately includes Naomi. It is painfully obvious in her performance that if she weren’t bound by contract, she wouldn’t have played in it, given the choice. Only two scenes of the entire two hours of running time are worthy of mention. One for its incredible dumbness (the scene at the university) and one coolly made scene with the bath and the water on the ceiling. I think that Nakata wanted to put an end to remakes of Asian pictures and so he sacrificed himself, putting his reputation on the line and filmed this pile of codswallop to end up on the shelves at the very back of the video rental stores: I see no other logical explanation... (2005.05.04)