The Theory of Everything
Rendező:
James MarshForgatókönyvíró:
Anthony McCartenOperatőr:
Benoît DelhommeZeneszerző:
Jóhann JóhannssonSzereplők:
Eddie Redmayne, Felicity Jones, Emily Watson, Harry Lloyd, David Thewlis, Charlie Cox, Charlotte Hope, Adam Godley, Lesley Manville, Maxine Peake (több)Tartalmak(1)
1963-ban a hírneves Cambridge-i Egyetemen Stephen Hawking, az ifjú kozmológus öles léptekkel halad a tudomány útján, és feltett szándéka, hogy talál egy "egyszerű, meggyőző magyarázatot" az univerzumra. Saját világa is kitárul, amikor fülig beleszeret egy bölcsész lányba, Jane Wilde-ba. Ám egy szerencsétlen baleset után ez az egészséges, aktív fiatalember 21 évesen megrázó diagnózissal kénytelen szembesülni: motoros neuronbetegség támadta meg végtagjait és képességeit, amely fokozatosan korlátozni fogja beszédében és mozgásában, és két éven belül bele fog halni. Jane szeretete, támogatása és elszántsága megingathatatlan, és a pár összeházasodik. Újdonsült feleségével az oldalán Stephen nem hajlandó tudomásul venni a diagnózist. Jane arra bátorítja Stephent, hogy fejezze be doktorátusát, melynek tárgya első elmélete az univerzum keletkezéséről. Családot alapítanak, és frissen szerzett és széles körben ünnepelt doktori címével felfegyverkezve Stephen belevág legambiciózusabb tudományos munkájába, melynek tárgya az, amiből neki oly kevés adatott: az idő. Miközben a teste egyre szűkebb korlátok közé kerül, szelleme túlszárnyal az elméleti fizika határain. (UIP-Duna Film)
(több)Recenziók (8)
A mostanában nagy sikert aratott három élettörténet - A mindenség elmélete / Kódjátszma / Amerikai mesterlövész - közül Hawkingé a leginspirálóbb és legvarázslatosabb, de egyben a legjobban megédesített is. Nem Hawkins-rajongóknak szóló film, hanem az élet tragédiáit, bonyolult emberi sorsokat, hosszú távú partneri hűséget és odaadást stb. stb. keresőknek szóló film. Az univerzum mélységét itt a legjobban a kerti tűzijáték nagy egészének felvétele mutatja meg, az előtérben kezeit fogó szerelmespárral... Bár a film nem válik giccsessé, nem is éri el a Szerelmünk lapjai költői lendületét és kapcsolati realizmusát. Ez inkább egy tankönyvi, szépen forgatott és eljátszott sablon, idealisztikusan hangzó történettel a jó vagy kivételes emberekről.
()
This film about Stephen Hawking was a slight disappointment for me. I was expecting an epic story from the life of a man who achieved the impossible, and in the end I got a romantic story that sometimes seemed to be more about Jane than about Stephen. The film is about a relationship that managed to survive anything. In my opinion, this relationship was rational in many ways and was based on absolute devotion. Stephen was very lucky to have people like this in his life. And the filmmakers were also lucky when they cast the beautiful Felicity Jones as Jane and the perfect Eddie Redmayne as Stephen. The movie was flawless in this respect, and the same goes for the music where Jóhann Jóhannsson did some real magic with his piano. The most fundamental problem lies in the story that is more of a romance than a biographical story, and which often seems like it doesn’t know what exactly it wants to tell. That doesn’t change the fact that Stephen had an incredible life and it was a pleasure to watch it in this movie. Hats off. Even though it must be said that this movie is far from perfect, I’m still giving it four stars for everything else that is worthy of attention and managed to squeeze the maximum out of this film.
()
It's like when the screenwriter only lets me have a glimpse of someone's biography, but just when I've started reading, they skip several pages. The instant romantic storyline doesn't catch my heart at all, and certainly not the snippets of scientific debates. All credit to Eddie Redmayne, in whom I didn't even see that handsome poster boy from Les Misérables for a second, but with this kind of storytelling austerity, neither he, nor Jóhann Jóhannsson's appropriately sensitive soundtrack, have a chance to take The Theory of Everything anywhere higher.
()
It's not about physics, it's more like a complicated relationship with a famous patient. The acting is top-notch, the direction is tight, but we don't get to learn much about the research and the important things Hawking accomplished.
()
A beautiful film with beautiful aesthetics about "beautiful" and noble people and their actions, which allows us to glimpse into the life of a brilliant scientist and theorist through a single perspective. It is utterly one-sided – even Forrest Gump had more layers. It is not bad, just painfully classical, yet still moving and pulsating with life. However, it will never become a classic or a message to generations.
()
A brilliant biopic, nicely understated in the British way of exaggerating the central character, who, despite his undeniable genius and sad physical disability, is portrayed as a sensitive, funny and loving person. But most importantly, for two hours we have the opportunity to fully feel the immense strength and sincerity of the relationship that prevails between the protagonists despite the minor conflicts. And Eddie Redmayne more than deserved his Oscar as he gives an absolutely amazing performance. The second time around, the film, apart from its formal mastery, probably won't offer me much, but this is quality work that must be appreciated.
()
This movie surprised me incredibly. I thought it would focus more on the period when Stephen Hawking was still relatively functional. To be honest, I didn't really believe in Eddie Redmayne. My mistake. The young actor brilliantly portrayed the physical transformation of the brilliant scientist, and it wasn't until the final credits that I realized this wasn't a documentary, that this wasn't the real Hawking. I bow down to Eddie's performance.
()
An incredibly shallow, simplistic, and at times almost tacky story. However, it was accompanied by great music plus an absolutely exquisite, brilliant, simply perfect performance by Eddie Redmayne. He did not only play a man suffering from ALS, but became one for the two hours of the movie. Really one of the best acting performances ever, absolutely 100% convincing. That is why my review is mainly about him. I'm trying to somehow ignore the main story about a woman going through some internal struggle and hardship in life, which was rather dull, as in much less interesting than the life and work of Stephen Hawking.
()