Rendező:
Václav HavelOperatőr:
Jan MalířZeneszerző:
Michal PavlíčekSzereplők:
Josef Abrhám, Oldřich Kaiser, Dagmar Havlová, Jaroslav Dušek, Tatiana Dyková, Eva Holubová, Vlasta Chramostová, Jiří Lábus, Jiří Macháček, Josef Polášek (több)Tartalmak(1)
Vilém Rieger held the office of Chancellor for many years and now can’t come to terms with the fact he has been ousted. His world has collapsed, as well it might since he also has to move out of the government villa that has become home for himself and his family. While he undergoes the humiliating process of separating government-issue property from his own private things, he involuntarily embarks upon an inventory of his relationships with the people around him. In the process he discovers that he never actually knew his family or his colleagues at all and is now in danger of being manipulated by everyone in his midst – including those closest to him. Václav Havel based his directorial debut on his own stage play which he began writing back in the summer of 1989, before the political changes occurred, propelling him towards the presidential office. The film adaptation of Leaving, a play within the poetic mode of absurd theatre, thus tinkers with autobiographical elements, but it is not the story of Havel himself. Musings on the powerlessness of the powerful in the face of their own ego call to mind Shakespeare’s King Lear and Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard. (Karlovy Vary International Film Festival)
(több)Videók (3)
Recenziók (7)
Such a colorful mausoleum of Václav Havel. The film is so terribly overloaded with intentional absurdity, tastelessness and diverse influences that any sting of the original text disappears in it and, unfortunately, its meaning is equally flawed. It is exactly the same syndrome that the Theatre on the Balustrade is dealing with after the death of Petr Lébl. Mixing Chekhov, Shakespeare, a Western, the First Republic, totalitarianism, entrepreneurial Baroque and many other ingredients so that the result has a clear meaning and really says something... that is the prerogative of great directors. And that's just not what Havel (with all due respect to him) is. Leaving is quite cute and fun in places, but as a whole it feels colorless and unnecessary. I don't know what the poet was saying - although otherwise, I like his verses very much.
()
In its own way, this is a very entertaining satire, which in its panoptical flexibility builds on the formal design of films by Pavlásková, Brabec, Šteindler, and Vachler. The unique world of Havel's Leaving turns into a parade of characters in spite of time, in spite of the political establishment, and just teases everything around it. However, we surprisingly get great costumes and characteristic acting performances in perfect symbiosis. The unique characters do not fit into one frame, but the overall image is almost jovially funny.
()
* 18/12/2011 :-( Absurdist theatre on the screen and nothing else. Leaving doesn’t have that much charm, it’s not very funny, but that doesn’t matter if you are willing to listen to it. What’s a little amazing, and also a shame, is that after an entire life wishing to make a film, Havel didn’t make his (unfortunately) only film more “film-like”. But I don’t regret the ninety minutes I spent with Leaving. Václav Havel was just too smart a person to make a silly or uninteresting film. And after reading the comments of certain individuals, he’s someone we might have not been worthy of as a nation. Honour your memory.
()
Content-wise I have no problem with it - it is after all Havel's reflection on his own statesmanship. However, I miss the point of why it is so overly kitschy (the constant rides of Malíř's camera after half an hour are so maddening), and why the well-known actors are competing with each other to see who can overact more. Yes, the theatre of the absurd has its own laws, but in that case, it should stay in theaters because it has absolutely nothing to do with the film medium. Overall, Leaving is nothing but a film illustration of itself, which makes it perfectly self-centered, repulsive to the ordinary film viewer, and completely pointless. In terms of receiving Czech film awards, this is either another product of theatrical posthumous glorification, or the rest of Czech creations should never have seen the light of day.
()
Václav Havel is no longer a dissident or president, he is now just a celebrity. For him, it is of course not difficult to gather a whole bunch of money and fulfill one of his dreams by making a feature film. The money is willingly donated by a well-known billionaire, a number of leading Czech actors consider it an honor to participate in the project, and the same goes for other film professions. Practically no Czech film in recent years can be said to have had such intensive PR as Leaving. Reports from the filming appeared in the media, interviews with actors who acted as if they had just taken a drug causing euphoria, and judging by these reports, it was supposed to be the film experience of the year. Therein lies the problem, because Leaving, with its content and film techniques used, is more of a film intended for the related audience in a film club. In reality, for example, Leaving was shown at a particular movie theater in 4 versions during the best screening times, which only happens to the biggest box office hits. The same movie theater boycotts films by the Coen brothers or Polanski because it considers them to be not commercial enough. The problem is also with the source material because the play of the same name was considered a theatrical event of the decade in the Czech Republic, but in the world, it received only a lukewarm reception and can be described as purely average. A top-notch film cannot be created from an average work, especially when the director has no previous film experience. Of course, this is not a catastrophe because the film crew, whether the camera, music, or cast, is truly among the best Czechs currently have. But it's a typical film meant for "blowing off steam." If it weren't for the eager fans among journalists who consider Havel to be a symbol of democracy and an unquestionable figure, and a similar group of oppositely inclined people who need to settle their scores with Havel for the same reasons, and thus their passionate debates fill the media, that film would simply and plainly disappear from theaters due to lack of audience interest and would sporadically appear in uninteresting times on public television... Overall impression: 40%.
()
Hirdetés