The Dark Knight Rises
Rendező:
Christopher NolanOperatőr:
Wally PfisterZeneszerző:
Hans ZimmerSzereplők:
Christian Bale, Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Anne Hathaway, Marion Cotillard, Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, Matthew Modine (több)Streaming (5)
Tartalmak(1)
Nyolc év telt el azóta, hogy egy szörnyű éjszakát követően Batman nyom nélkül eltűnt. Magára vállalta Harvey Dent államügyész minden vétkét, és a hősből üldözött bűnöző lett. Önfeláldozása azonban nem volt hiábavaló: a Dent-törvénynek köszönhetően Gotham békés várossá vált. Átmenetileg. A városban feltűnik egy macskajelmezes betörő, aki sötét titkokat rejteget; és megérkezik Bane is, a különös álarcot viselő, gátlástalan bűnöző. Bruce Wayne féltve őrzött magánya nem tarthat örökké, a városnak ismét szüksége van a Sötét Lovagra. Ám a köpönyeg és az álarc ellenére úgy tűnik, Bane legyőzhetetlen. (InterCom)
(több)Videók (46)
Recenziók (16)
Nincs benne már az meglepetés wow! hatása, amely elfedné az érzéketlen bánásmódot a szereplőkkel. Ez az előző filmben még megbocsáthatóan jelen volt, de a harmadik rész már elsüllyed benne. Lehetetlen megemészteni minden egyes fordulatot és annak hatását a szereplőkre, akikből túl sok van, koncepció nélkül felbukkannak és eltűnnek, csak azért, hogy valami menőt tegyenek, és elmondjanak egy mondatot (amelyek közül egyikre sem érdemes emlékezni). Ráadásul Nolan (az Eredet után) ismét alábecsüli a nézők intelligenciáját, és olcsó szamárhidakkal eteti őket. Hardy gonosztevője egy unalmas izomhegy, aki maszkjával a hangjával érdekes, de nem kelt sem félelmet, sem tiszteletet. Az egyetlen hasznos dolog a Macskanőben (vagy bárki is akar lenni) a domború fenék, miközben motorozik. Hans Zimmer az egyedüli, aki végzi itt a legjobb munkát az egész trilógiából. Felhasználja a korábbi epizódok motívumait, újakat ad hozzá (a Sherlockból ismert balkáni zongora a trükkös Macskanőhöz és az anarchikus énekek Bane-hez nagyszerű felfrissítés), és bombasztikus, zenekarilag változatos akciós hátteret varázsol az egykori lapos, sötét depresszióval teli masszából. Miért négy csillag ennyi kritika után? Még mindig megvan benne az a kolosszalitás, amiben Nolan elérhetetlen. Azzal az epikussággal és óriási lendülettel, amit élvezed és hagyod, hogy magával ragadjon, még akkor is, ha nem érdekel, mi történik, miért történik, vagy hová vezet.
()
Until the American anthem was played, this the best I've ever seen in an American blockbuster - for a lot of people this means that they'll be bored for about the first hour, but I enjoyed the masterful tension with which Nolan completely controls the screen. He is able to do so without action, and only with a massively built feeling of restlessness. After the American anthem, I began to have issues with the film - the brothers probably heard the criticism that came down against the Dark Knight's ideological background from the left and seemed to want to settle accounts with supporters of social justice and redistribution. However, they chose a destructive "weapon of choice" - Bane is an enchanting, overwhelming and utterly demonic character that allows Bale’s Wayne / Batman to do what they are strongest at: sacrificing themselves for the film / Gotham. In the end, I was missing more systematic work with the story and characters, the pace is deliberately very impetuous and the dosing out of information is cumbersome. The quite contradictory return to the "comic" mythology of the first film is also quite surprising... The final mega-twist, which weakens Bane's pure evil aura a little, tore me out of a pious ravings about one of the best characters in the trilogy. But I wonder in vain when the last time was that I saw something so overwhelming, monstrous, majestic and yet honed in terms of filmmaking. It was said that Batman would be the king of the season - and despite many objections, he definitely was for me. Edit: Only the second viewing will reveal how consistent and yet emotionally fertile this film is. The IMAX copy is stunning, and the film gains through every detail. Grandiose...
()
A monumental film – maybe too much so. It exhausted me as if I’d had to carry Bane on my back for three hours. The Dark Knight Rises has a massive scope, it follows about a billion different characters and the network of motivations and relationships among them it’s never very clear (at least not after watching it once). In all this burnt-out expanse, it needs to resort to various shortcuts (someone always comes and meets someone – without it being clear how they knew that said someone would be there – then they say something important and carry on – repeat and rinse after a bit) and pathetic holy speeches (and I won’t even mention the bus full of orphans), while Bane’s plan and its execution feels very dodgy. Yeah, it’s (only) a “comic book movie” and you also can find similar “comic book” twists, motifs and dialogues in the previous two parts, but here it’s a bit too much and Nolan is trying to take his very realistic concept too far. Naturally, the movie is technically flawless. In the end, it’s the character of Bruce the one who gets most of the attention, so as a conclusion to “his” trilogy, it does work well in all its fatality and epic (8/10). As a standalone film, however, it grinds a little. Let’s hope that in two years Christopher will go for something smaller. PS: Of course, it’s very likely that watching it a second time will make the film feel more cohesive, complex and clear (as usual with Nolan), but I don’t feel like going through it again so soon.
()
“Do you feel in charge?” This is exactly the kind of hard-hitting ending to an epic saga that you would expect from a maximalist like Nolan. With the exception of the overwrought action scenes and the expanded number of characters, Nolan couldn’t take it much farther than he did in The Dark Knight. There was nowhere else to go. So he returned to the roots instead. Batman must rise again, start over and definitively come to terms with the burden that he has carried since Batman Begins, which is represented here by the character of Bane. ___ Whereas the Joker used uncontrollable chaos, Bane employs brute, straightforward physical force. His objective is not to destroy Batman only as a symbol, which is what the maniacal clown managed to do (while his success is reaffirmed when the long-term unsustainability of the status quo built on lies is exposed), but also as a person. The villain and the mistaken and doubting supporting characters again overshadow the titular hero, who admittedly gets more space to deliver his clumsily written lines (with literally expressed thoughts that the film’s creators are unable to convey to viewers simply by hinting at them) without his mask and in his human voice, but his “developmental arc” is merely a variation on that from the first film (with the difference being that his father doesn’t help him out this time) and he is rather predictable in his behaviour (much more so than Bane or the excellent Selina Kyle, whom I’d like to see played by Anne Hathaway in a separate film), just as the rest of the film is predictable. ___ Based on proven narrative formulas, the story generates situations that assault the eye with their calculated nature. The characters’ decisions are not rationalised very well. The degree of care with which the whole film was designed and calculated for effect is apparent in the casualness with which Bruce Wayne puts on the bat costume again after eight years of living in seclusion, the large number of characters appearing in the right place at the right time, and the sudden and correct decisions made by those who had previously been hesitant. Characters make dumb decisions so that Nolan can offer us epic scenes (such as the fight between Batman and Bane) and to serve a particular purpose. Of course, in any fictional film, things naturally don’t happen for any other reason than a conscious decision on the part of the screenwriter, but this fact is more skilfully disguised in other films. ___ Like The Dark Knight, the third instalment is elevated by an uncompromising villain who is well aware of the power of money and of the game (in this case, American football), two phenomena that bring rich and poor together. The villain’s radically Marxist plan with an unclear objective (does he want to destroy Gotham, or leave it to the rabble?) include a forceful attack on both of these pillars of capitalism. Unlike in our reality, the financial crisis in the film is caused by outside interference, not by gradual internal decay, and the culprit is thus easier to identify, track down and punish (e.g. in Skyfall from the same year, whose directing Sam Mendes admits was inspired by The Dark Knight, the evil is of a much more unique nature). However, the attempt to depict the anxieties of today is apparent, but leftist liberals will not be enthusiastic about handing over responsibility to heroic members of the police force. ___ At the stylistic level, Nolan doesn’t come up with anything new, but only clarifies and intensifies what he did before. Nolan again pulls out his favourite shot dyad comprising “static dialogue scene – cut to camera moving over the city with a bird’s-eye view”, the exceedingly epic music of Hans Zimmer is again heard from the opening minutes (and thus cannot be further intensified in the truly important scenes, though the musical motifs assigned to the individual characters and their intertwining work very nicely), and there is again a disconnect between the psychologically believable background and the exaggerated action scenes (the assault on the plane in flight is just as good as the tanks and submarines in the Fast & Furious movies). Thanks to the longer shots and more proportionate use of parallel montages, the hand-to-hand fighting and shootouts are clearer. ___ The structure of The Dark Knight Rises is more ambitious and more clearly arranged than that of the two preceding films. After the fight between Batman and Bane (which happens roughly at the mid-point of the film), there is a fade-out and the initial distribution of powers is overturned. Evil comes to the surface; good is sidelined. In the second half, with its livelier plot, the pace is significantly faster, because there is the necessity of developing motifs and concluding the storylines not only from the first half of the film (the bomb, the removal of Selina from the most-wanted list), but also from the first two films (Ra’s al Ghul, Scarecrow, the lie about Dent), which leads to the sometimes ridiculous attempt to convey truly a lot of information in a short time (I was impressed by the scene in which the characters are waiting for Marion Cotillard’s character to slowly say what she has to say while a bomb ticks a few meters away with only a few tens of seconds remaining until it is set to explode). The narrative, which is made more suspenseful by the establishment of a rapidly shortening deadline (23 days, 18 hours, 45 minutes, then 11 minutes pass, and then five minutes remain), basically doesn’t slow down until the end. In retrospect, the first half thus seems like an eighty-minute, mostly dialogue-driven, character-developing prologue for eighty minutes of thrilling action. ___ The Dark Knight Rises succeeds in being both truly dark and incredibly thrilling, albeit at the cost of unconvincing plot twists, odd confusion of ideas and expressive ponderousness and literalism, but if every attempt at making a monumental cinematic spectacle ended in a similar "failure", I wouldn’t complain. 85% Appendix: A lot of reviews address the speed with which characters travel between the prison and Gotham. According to one of the lines uttered in the film, the prison is located in the “ancient part of the town”, not somewhere in Africa or the Middle East, so it shouldn’t be such a problem to get to Gotham even on foot.
()
(kevesebbet)
(több)
It was only after the second viewing that I fully understood and appreciated why Nolan turned the wheel after the acclaimed second film and once again rode the comic book waves, just like he did with the first one. More than anything else, the third film concludes the trilogy. I can understand the disappointed responses that were expecting something in the style of a funny anarchist madman Joker, but I don't buy the criticism about the poorly told story. The phrase "monstrous epic," used by many around here, suits this film better than anything else. The uncompromising Bane brings Gotham to its knees with brute force to make it suffer before giving it a taste of death. As well as its black-caped guardian. This isn't the Nolan brothers expressing their worldview, this is a critique of everyone for whom the idea of social justice is a political idol. Therefore, before the last atom completes the fission reaction, it is necessary to rise physically, but especially spiritually. This is the engine of the entire film, building Nolan's precise narrative that works both in the characters' dialogue and in the surprisingly spare but superbly raw action. All of this is then only perfectly complemented by Zimmer's thunderous music, without which the film would work a third less. If anyone wants to restart this at Warner Brothers, they should be thinking about changing careers by now. PS: Christopher Nolan is, along with David Fincher, the best cinematic storyteller of his generation. No question about it.
()
Hirdetés