Mission: Impossible 2

Predictable plot and a bunch of all sorts of stupid clichés (I’ve lost count of the times I’ve seen a main villain aiming at the protagonist and instead of immediately pulling the trigger, he starts talking) that I dislike so much. Moreover, the Hollywood air doesn't really suit John Woo, the action sequences are rather lame for a filmmaker of his calibre (except maybe the final chase) and I don't believe Cruise as a super agent. As a typical brainwasher, M.I.II is passable in those two hours, but it doesn't impress with anything. The 550 million box office returns worldwide is a bit of a mystery to me. (2005.05.01)

Ethan Hunt's fundamental problem is the fact that he is unable to find his identity. Neither his personal, nor the genre identity. Whilst De Palma took the path of an action spy film, John Woo walked down a path ever so familiar to him: the path of an action movie. But the script is so broken, so covered with stones and rubble, that roughly the first half of the film is a complete mess. The level of dialogues is at the level of an unintentional absurd drama, the plot is horribly schematic, and there is no tension. Where in the first film the viewer struggled a little with the plot, Woo offers a dismal compilation of slow-motion and pseudo-spy scenes filmed with a lack of interest, which will not convince even a five-year-old child of their credibility. The expected break into the action finale does not bring relief. Again, one cannot identify with Hunt in any way - the character contains nothing interesting at all except a million-dollar face and nice clothes. The love storyline is annoying and naive, so there is no compassion for melodramatic tones. The truth is that as soon as the pigeons appear on the scene, Woo finds himself on his favorite steamer again and cuts out a pretty nice action sequence, which, as a result, sounds like an absolute cry into the dark. This did not work for everyone involved (except perhaps Hans Zimmer). (2007.01.15)

It has a very dumb script (even for an action film), a good cast, but it doesn't show anything for the whole runtime, so even a couple of pretty "cool" action scenes don't pull it out of mediocrity. Woo has no need for such useless and uninteresting films, and he's needlessly tarnishing his reputation on them. (2005.04.29)

From a negative attitude to a positively tuned tolerance to a surprised admiration. The way Woo reimagined the series is unparalleled, but we can thank him for the number of spent bullets hiding in each adventure. Lots of action, style or slow-motion scenes, excessively emotional dialogues bordering on B-movie romance, and Ethan Hunt in the role of an unstoppable Mohican. Everything slightly beyond the acceptable cheesy factor - and yet this part is the one I have seen the most. (2006.05.12)

Thanks to the fact that the Mission: Impossible franchise changes the director with every instalment, it retains not only its freshness, but also its connection to the current trends in Hollywood cinema. None of the directors works in isolation, as each of them fits into a particular period of Hollywood cinema. Whereas the franchise began to significantly foreshadow trends starting with the third film, M:I-2 now seems like a bitter relic of the decade that it capped off. The revisionism in which a Bond-esque hero falls in love is reduced, with typical ’90s overdone cool machismo, to a ridiculous fairy tale about love at first superficial sight. John Woo's excessively theatrical and gracefully formalistic style is freed from the charged fatefulness of archetypal values and urgency of his Hong Kong films of the time and becomes an unintentionally humorous quirk. It would be nice to celebrate the stylistic freedom and formalism that replace symbolism and formulas, but due to the combination of those attributes with the intrusive dickishness of most of the characters, the film leaves a rather bitter aftertaste. The attempt to make Ethan Hunt an icon of coolness further fails thanks to the futile screenplay, exaggeration to the point of parody, and the cartoonishly overwrought antagonist with perhaps the least charisma ever seen in a movie. Mission: Impossible II is now a frightening reminder of how desperately formulaic and self-regardingly bombastic Hollywood blockbusters were until relatively recently. Not that there aren’t still devotees of the tendency to make dickishness a priority in the 1990s or that today’s sophistication doesn’t frequently slide into self-centred masturbation, but Hollywood’s flagship films are now navigating different waters. After all, the latest instalment of the franchise, Rogue Nation, exhibits a number of parallels with M:I-2, particularly the “bold” villain and the protagonist’s relationship with his ambivalent female colleague. Thanks to the consistent rejection of the superficial and, conversely, the consistent development of the character, as well as the screenplay, which carefully straddles the line between fatefulness and dashing humour, it avoids all of the ridiculous ills of the era when women automatically fell into the arms of the protagonists and the heroes fought angry retributive duels with evil villains. (2015.09.03)

A fantastically directed action movie by the master of masters John Woo. The plot is not essential and the storyline itself is practically pulled out of thin air, with all the lapses in logic and screenplay flaws that come with it. However, the action is filmed so perfectly that one cannot help but forgive all the downsides. Woo has an unbelievable sense for visuals and colors (Seville, the scenes in the desert, the shootout in BioCyte), he doesn't miss any detail and puts an unprecedented effort into it. One example of his precise craftsmanship is the shootout in the multi-story building, which is simply breathtaking, not only because of its dynamics, but also the overall visual concept (sparks, lighting, camera). This is where Woo is truly the best, and it is the film’s main attraction. As the second and third thing that make me give it a full score, there is the brilliant atmospheric music and possibly one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen. (2005.05.08)

John Woo knows how to make a scene impactful, but somehow he has forgotten how to make the whole film interesting. Some scenes are surprisingly drawn-out and tiring, which also affects the jokes that lack the right punch. Tom Cruise is suited for this role, but the face swapping was overly exaggerated in this case. The film is too long to truly entertain throughout its entirety. (2014.05.07)